Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070908100909m69b876cdt1723f2fbd2462a40@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> One fairly simple way would use a new SQL verb (say, DO) like this: > >> DO $$ something in plfoo $$ LANGUAGE plfoo; > > Yeah, this has been suggested before. I can't see anything very wrong > with it. > >> We could even default the langauge to plpgsql, for which you would then >> just need: > >> DO $$ something in plpgsql $$; > > Add a GUC variable to set the default language, perhaps? > >> But to make it really nice you'd have to move away from pl programs as >> strings. That would be a lot more work, and you really wouldn't want to >> make it work with more than one PL for the sake of everyone's sanity. > > That would be an awful lot of messiness to save four keystrokes... I think it would be awfully handy to integrate some of the features of PL/pgsql into core SQL - especially variables, and also things like IF and FOR... but I'm not expecting it to happen any time soon, or maybe ever. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: