Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070907150415v46a0afc3l53ed6a166fbabc1d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07 (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Fujii Masao<masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > If the above is OK, should I update the patch ASAP? or > suspend that update until many other comments arrive? > I'm concerned that frequent small updating interferes with > a review. I decided (perhaps foolishly), to assign reviewers for the two smaller patches that you extracted from this first, and to hold off on assigning a reviewer for the main patch until those reviews were completed: http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb0907022341m1d36a841x19c3e2a5a6906b5b@mail.gmail.com http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb0907030037g515f3337o9092279c62348dc@mail.gmail.com So I think you should update ASAP in this case. As soon as we get some reviewers freed up from the initial reviewing round, I will assign one or more reviewers to the main Sync Rep patch. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: