Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> There's another issue which is that of the $Id$ and similar tags.  We
>> have to decide what we want to do with them.  If we're not going to have
>> them in the Git repository, then they are only causing trouble right now
>> and it would be better to get rid of them completely for the conversion,
>> to avoid the noise that they will invariably cause.
>
> What was in the back of my mind was that we'd go around and mass-remove
> $PostgreSQL$ (and any other lurking tags), but only from HEAD and only
> after the repo conversion.  Although just before it would be okay too.
> The stickier part of this is what to do about back branches;
> particularly whether we are okay with checked-out versions of past
> releases not matching the actual shipped tarballs on this point.

Mass-deleting these tags from HEAD and the current head of each
back-branch seems like a good place to start.

...Robert