Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070904050455h1afaf279sb805e29c077e2272@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> If there are no objections, I'm going to remove the following items >> from the list at >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.4_Open_Items >> >> >> change cardinality() for multi-dim arrays? >> >> Drop; there's no consensus that this should be changed > > I don't think we should let this go quite so easily, as this is a new > function, so the bias should be to "getting it right" rather than "don't > change it". I think it is right already, but the point is debatable. > The supplied functionality is not only surprising, but easily obtained by an > existing function. ISTM if we're supplying a new function it should have new > functionality. Well, it's a compatibility function... ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: