Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070812031337q16a6ff42p48a0eb189cae12bd@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I can see an argument about constraint_exclusion but > default_statistics_target I don't. Why not? I don't want to accept a big increase in ANALYZE times (or planning times, though I'm really not seeing that at this point) without some benefit. >> It seems unlikely that you would want 256 MB of checkpoint segments on >> a database that is only 100 MB (or even 500 MB). But you might very >> well want that on a database that is 1 TB. > > It also seems unlikely that you would hit 256MB of checkpoint segments > on a 100MB database before checkpoint_timeout and if you did, you > certainly did need them. So why do we have this parameter at all? ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: