Re: ready for another one, i guess

I think that one probably needs review from -core.  It's been
extensively discussed on -hackers several times already, and is on
version 19, so I doubt there are obvious bugs remaining.

Arguably it could use additional performance testing, though I think
Greg has done quite a bit already, but I'm not in a good position to
undertake that either for a patch of this type.

...Robert

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I reviewed Peter Eisentraut's TABLE command - needs more work.
>>
>> Heikki has not responded to my request for a status update on
>> optimizing COPY with memchr, so I think there is nothing to do on that
>> one for now.  It looks like it is still WIP.
>>
>> I have updated the Wiki with status on these two patches.
>
> Thanks Robert. I assume you want another one - posix_fadvise? If
> that's OK, please mark the wiki page.
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com
>