Re: array_agg and array_accum (patch)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: array_agg and array_accum (patch) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070810282108m3f4dc1d3qe4e127b5268ecb81@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: array_agg and array_accum (patch) (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: array_agg and array_accum (patch)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
It's worth noting that this is the third version of this idea that has been submitted. Ian Caulfield submitted a patch to add this, and so did I. Someone should probably look at all three of them and compare. ...Robert On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 18:47 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> How else will you tell an aggregate function whose result depends on the >> input order which order you want? The only aggregates defined in the >> standard where this matters are array_agg, array_accum, and xmlagg, but > > I don't see array_accum() in the standard, I wrote it just as an > alternative to array_agg() because I thought array_agg() ignored NULLs. > > Regards, > Jeff Davis > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: