Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6006.1283966378@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ... (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at> writes: > Tom Lane �rta: >> AFAIR, canonical pathkeys are the *only* thing in the planner where pure >> pointer equality is interesting. So I doubt this hack is of any use for >> EquivalenceClass, even if the lists were likely to be long which they >> aren't. > No, for EquivalanceClass->ec_member, I need to do something > funnier, like implement compare(Node *, Node *) and use that > instead of equal(Node *, Node *)... Something like nodeToString() > on both Node * and strcmp() the resulting strings. Well, (a) that doesn't work (hint: there are fields in nodes that are intentionally ignored by equal()), and (b) I still don't believe that there's an actual bottleneck there. ECs generally aren't very big. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: