Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6000.1069356024@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd? (Chester Kustarz <chester@arbor.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd?
Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd? |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Chester Kustarz <chester@arbor.net> writes: > i have some tables which are insert only. i do not want to vacuum them > because there are never any dead tuples in them and the vacuum grows the > indexes. Those claims cannot both be true. In any case, plain vacuum cannot grow the indexes --- only a VACUUM FULL that moves a significant number of rows could cause index growth. > vacuum is to reclaim dead tuples. this means it depends on update and > delete. analyze depends on data values/distribution. this means it depends on > insert, update, and delete. thus the dependencies are slightly different > between the 2 operations, an so you can come up with use-cases that > justify running either more frequently. Agreed. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: