Re: Postresql RFD version 2.0 Help Wanted.
От | Gary L. Burnore |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postresql RFD version 2.0 Help Wanted. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6.1.1.1.2.20041107211003.03a69010@popd.databasix.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postresql RFD version 2.0 Help Wanted. (Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
At 12:16 AM 11/7/2004, Russ Allbery wrote: >In news.groups, Mike Cox <mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com> writes: > > > I'm pretty much done with this anyway. It is a waste of time putting in > > anymore effort since no one seems to want it. > >Well, the problem from my perspective is that a lot of time and energy is >being spent on worrying about how to propose something or what possible >problems there might be with the group and no one (and I'm not asking you >to do this -- I understand very well where you're coming from and am >extremely sympathetic) has not taken the simple first step of just asking >Marc what the status of the groups are. > >If Marc was happy with them being turned into real Big Eight groups and >the technical issues of the gatewaying were worked out with Marco or >someone else, I think everything would fall in place very simply. You'd >get a newsgroup, you wouldn't have to care about the gateway, and we'd be >down to arguing about which mailing lists should be gated. > >As is, this thread is currently full of speculation about lots of things >that may or may not be problems and would be cleared up by getting all the >involved parties in the discussion. And everyone seems to be wanting you >to do this, which I think is a little unfair since the gateways aren't >even what you're worried about in the first place and you'd just have to >play telephone. > >I really need to *not* be volunteering to do this, since I have a dozen >other things that I've already promised other people to work on, but it's >really frustrating that no one else is doing it either. I'll volunteer. This shouldn't be ThAT hard to fix.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: