Re: Bug in triggers
От | Chris Travers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug in triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5ed37b141003051512q2ecffadr9518410e010731a1@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug in triggers (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug in triggers
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wro= te: >>> It does seem weird that assigning NEW to var changes the value; I'm >>> not sure why that happens. =A0Is that what you're asking about? > >> Anyone else have an opinion on whether this is a bug? > > It's arguably a bug, but since we lack consensus on whether NULL and > ROW(NULL,NULL,...) are the same thing, it's difficult to make a > bulletproof case either way. =A0In any case nothing is likely to get done > about it in the near term because it's wired into plpgsql's > implementation. =A0Changing from row to record representation of such > variables is possible but would probably have side effects, ie, it would > create new compatibility issues of unknown seriousness. =A0I'm not too > optimistic about the performance implications either. I don't know if it is a bug. Different textual representations could easily happen due to intermediate conversions of datatypes.... For example: I wouldn't expect timestamp::date::text to equal timestamp::text. Textual representations are not necessarily consistent. I guess a better question for Oleg might be: "Why is it important to you to get this fixed? What are you trying to do that you can't do without fixing this?" Best Wishes, Chris Travers
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: