Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5e28058f-6622-48ce-97c9-257051f905ff@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 17.05.24 13:36, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> On 17 May 2024, at 13:13, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > >> But if we are to guess what those reasons might be, Tom has already >> admitted he does that for CI, and I do the same, so probably other >> people also do it. I also suspect that some people are essentially >> using the CF app as a personal todo list. By sticking patches in there >> that they intend to commit next cycle, they both (1) feel virtuous, >> because they give at least the appearance of following the community >> process and inviting review before they commit and (2) avoid losing >> track of the stuff they plan to commit. >> >> There may be other reasons, too. > > I think there is one more which is important: 3) Giving visibility into "this > is what I intend to commit". Few can follow -hackers to the level where they > can have an overview of ongoing and/or finished work which will go in. The CF > app does however provide that overview. This is essentially the TODO list > aspect, but sharing one's TODO isn't all bad, especially for maintainers. Ok, but these cases shouldn't use a separate "parking lot". They should use the same statuses and flow diagram as the rest. (Maybe with more dotted lines, sure.)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: