[GENERAL] Is auto-analyze as thorough as manual analyze?
От | Jack Christensen |
---|---|
Тема | [GENERAL] Is auto-analyze as thorough as manual analyze? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5ddd2617-66b0-a6e2-3af4-618e09a96647@jackchristensen.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Is auto-analyze as thorough as manual analyze?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Just had an issue where a prepared query would occasionally choose a very bad plan in production. The same data set in a different environment consistently would choose the index scan. As would be expected, running analyze on that table in production resolved the issue. However, before I ran the analyze I checked pg_stat_user_tables to see last_autoanalyze for that table. It had run today. But the problem existed before that. I would have expected that the auto-analyze would have corrected this (or prevented it entirely if run enough). So that leaves me wondering: is an auto-analyze the same as manually running analyze or is a manual analyze more thorough? This is running version 9.6.3 on Heroku. Thanks, Jack -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: