Re: insensitive collations
От | Daniel Verite |
---|---|
Тема | Re: insensitive collations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5c7f51b0-6788-4ffd-b9c4-23b710373140@manitou-mail.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: insensitive collations (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: insensitive collations
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Here is an updated patch. On a table with pre-existing contents, the creation of a unique index does not seem to detect the duplicates that are equal per the collation and different binary-wise. postgres=# \d test3ci Table "public.test3ci" Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default --------+------+------------------+----------+--------- x | text | case_insensitive | | postgres=# select * from test3ci; x ----- abc ABC def ghi (4 rows) postgres=# create unique index idx on test3ci(x); -- EXPECTED TO FAIL CREATE INDEX postgres=# \d test3ci Table "public.test3ci" Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default --------+------+------------------+----------+--------- x | text | case_insensitive | | Indexes: "idx" UNIQUE, btree (x) postgres=# select count(*) from test3ci where x='abc'; count ------- 2 (1 row) OTOH with an already existing unique index, attempts to insert such duplicates are rejected as expected. Best regards, -- Daniel Vérité PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org Twitter: @DanielVerite
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: