Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2
| От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5c198b5802cf5b56c19e76bd8c9d97ea@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2 ("Derek Rodner" <derek.rodner@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > Part 1 - > http://www.databasejournal.com/features/oracle/article.php/3692566 > > Part 2 - > http://www.databasejournal.com/features/oracle/article.php/3703376 > > I'd be interested to get the community's take on the portrayal > of Postgres. Wow. I thought that it couldn't get worse than Part 1. I was wrong. Unlike part 1, which is full of vague statements and offers no real content, part 2 is full of misinformation about all three database systems, and simply adds more confusion rather than helping anyone learn any actual feature comparisons. Amazing that anyone would publish something like that. I would think an editor at Database Journal who was even vaguely familiar with any of the three systems would have intervened. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200710111529 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFHDnoCvJuQZxSWSsgRA5i3AKDd0Nuy6FBxmcuVdyrRqT7F3PIaSACg/U/A I0wu3B1NlcYi9iAwiT/8aR4= =Cibp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: