Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5b8ca33e-0ccf-cc02-bae5-079120f56c4f@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/02/2020 21:56, Jeff Davis wrote: > On Tue, 2020-02-04 at 18:10 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> I'd love to change the LogicalTape API so that you could allocate >> and >> free tapes more freely. I wrote a patch to do that, as part of >> replacing >> tuplesort.c's polyphase algorithm with a simpler one (see [1]), but >> I >> never got around to committing it. Maybe the time is ripe to do that >> now? > > It's interesting that you wrote a patch to pause the tapes a while ago. > Did it just fall through the cracks or was there a problem with it? > > Is pause/resume functionality required, or is it good enough that > rewinding a tape frees the buffer, to be lazily allocated later? It wasn't strictly required for what I was hacking on then. IIRC it would have saved some memory during sorting, but Peter G felt that it wasn't worth the trouble, because he made some other changes around the same time, which made it less important (https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAM3SWZS0nwOPoJQHvxugA9kKPzky2QC2348TTWdSStZOkke5tg%40mail.gmail.com). I dropped the ball on both patches then, but I still think they would be worthwhile. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: