Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5b72cf02-61e1-0219-cc91-c6b4e4144c8b@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default? (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-01-03 11:20, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> On 3 Jan 2019, at 10:39, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote: >> >> Re: Peter Eisentraut 2019-01-02 <70440c81-37bb-76dd-e48b-b5a9550d5613@2ndquadrant.com> > >>> While we're considering the pg_regress output, what do you think about >>> replacing the ======... separator with a standard diff separator like >>> "diff %s %s %s\n". This would make the file behave more like a proper >>> diff file, for use with other tools. And it shows the diff options >>> used, for clarity. See attached patch. >> >> It will especially say which _alternate.out file was used, which seems >> like a big win. So +1. > > That has bitten more times than I’d like to admit, so definately +1 on being > explicit about that. committed (This might be one of those rare times where one hopes for a buildfarm failure for verification. :-) ) -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: