Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use asynchronous connect API inlibpqwalreceiver
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use asynchronous connect API inlibpqwalreceiver |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5b6a6d6d-fb45-0afb-2e95-5600063c3dbd@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use asynchronous connect API in libpqwalreceiver (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use asynchronous connect API in libpqwalreceiver
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 17/03/17 16:07, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> I have confirmed on jacana Petr's observation that adding a timeout to >> the WaitLatchOrSocket cures the problem. > > Does anyone have a theory as to why that cures the problem? > I now have theory and even PoC patch for it. The long wait of WaitLatchOrSocket happens after connection state switches from CONNECTION_STARTED to CONNECTION_MADE in both cases the return value of PQconnectPoll is PGRES_POLLING_WRITING so we wait for FD_WRITE. Now the documentation for WSAEventSelect says "The FD_WRITE network event is handled slightly differently. An FD_WRITE network event is recorded when a socket is first connected with a call to the connect, ConnectEx, WSAConnect, WSAConnectByList, or WSAConnectByName function or when a socket is accepted with accept, AcceptEx, or WSAAccept function and then after a send fails with WSAEWOULDBLOCK and buffer space becomes available. Therefore, an application can assume that sends are possible starting from the first FD_WRITE network event setting and lasting until a send returns WSAEWOULDBLOCK. After such a failure the application will find out that sends are again possible when an FD_WRITE network event is recorded and the associated event object is set." But while PQconnectPoll does connect() before setting connection status to CONNECTION_STARTED and returns PGRES_POLLING_WRITING so the FD_WRITE eventually happens, it does not do any writes in the code block that switches to CONNECTION_MADE and PGRES_POLLING_WRITING. That means FD_WRITE event is never recorded as per quoted documentation. Then what remains is why it works in libpq. If you look at pgwin32_select which is eventually called by libpq code, it actually handles the situation by trying empty WSASend on any socket that is supposed to wait for FD_WRITE and only calling the WaitForMultipleObjectsEx when WSASend failed with WSAEWOULDBLOCK, when the WSASend succeeds it immediately returns ok. So I did something similar in attached for WaitEventSetWaitBlock() and it indeed solves the issue my windows test machine. Now the coding/placement probably isn't the best (and there are no comments), but maybe somebody will find proper place for this now that we know the cause. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: