Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5b38cdac-d072-ccdd-6d06-695137ce7482@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2 (Martin Goodson <kaemaril@googlemail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 05/16/2017 08:39 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: > On 16/05/2017 15:58, Adrian Klaver wrote: >> For completeness what does: >> >> ls -al /usr/lib64/libssl.so >> >> show? >> > (Trimming things down a bit to keep things a little bit more readable, > now we've got the package dependencies issue sorted. Hopefully. > > Hope that's OK?) See this recent thread for why this is OK and recommended: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BbJJbyutGGOKN-wiBDeLrNU-oB%3D_-81xEnfXRcY0wo%2BZRKvZw%40mail.gmail.com > > I can see the following: > > $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libssl.so > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 15 16:57 /usr/lib64/libssl.so -> > libssl.so.1.0.1e > Seems okay to me. > > OK, thank you. I'll pass that along to our UNIX team and ask for that to > be installed, see what we get ... I see from subsequent post that this did not work. Per Tom's suggestion try ldd /db_demo/app/postgres/9.6.2-3/lib/libldap_r-2.4.so.2 > > Regards, > > Martin. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: