Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round2 - compilation issues.

On 12/05/2017 16:18, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> On 05/12/2017 08:13 AM, Martin Goodson wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Yesterday I had problems getting repmgr installed, since our PostgreSQL
>> installs to a non-standard place, and doesn't use any postgresql
>> repositories/packages. The responses I got generally seemed to be 'you
>> need to compile it'.
>>
>> I'm running ubuntu server 17.04. The EnterpriseDB installer was used to
>> quickly install a quick test PostgreSQL db, "testdb" under owning userid
>> "testdb". Here is the output of pg_config:
>>
>
> This is your problem. As Adrian already mentioned, you should be
> running the PGDG apt repos.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/ubuntu/
>
> Universal installers are great for a one off, "Hey let's see what we
> can do!" but they are not useful once you want to extend, have
> community support and or do things like easily install Repmgr.
>
> Good luck!
>
> JD
>
Thanks for the response. The problem is I'm kind of stuck with using
EnterpriseDB's community edition installers. It's a company policy. I
can't install PostgreSQL using repositories, I ** have ** to use the
'Universal Installer' from EnterpriseDB.

Surely there must be a way to build repmgr for, and integrate it into, a
PostgreSQL db cluster built using EnterpriseDB? Am I really somehow
running up against a hard limit or am I simply missing something?

Regards,

Martin.
--
Martin Goodson

"Have you thought up some clever plan, Doctor?"
"Yes, Jamie, I believe I have."
"What're you going to do?"
"Bung a rock at it."