Re: Is autovaccum lazy?
От | Brian Modra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is autovaccum lazy? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5a9699850912050538k27aec805gf6a68b725adfa3e8@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Is autovaccum lazy? (A B <gentosaker@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
2009/12/5 A B <gentosaker@gmail.com>: > Hello. > I just ran these commands > > select pg_database_size('cdb'); > vacuum full; > select pg_database_size('cdb'); > > and got > > 315250448 > ---- > 90669060 > > So I guess that the vaccuum full command released space that was not > used any more. A week ago I guess the same commands would have > resulted in quite similar numbers. Is there some way of finding out > what the autovaccum have done? I'm having a hard time beliving that > the autovaccuum has done it's job properly since there were so much > "wasted" space, or did it just not find it worth the effort to release > the unused space? > Any thoughts about this? Vacuum full clears up more space, than plain vacuum... however, that does not mean its "better", in fact, its not advised: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/VACUUM_FULL#When_.28not.29_to_use_VACUUM_FULL > > I might have a similar system I could run these commands on. Any > advice on other commands to run then to find out more? > > -- > Sent via pgsql-novice mailing list (pgsql-novice@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-novice > -- Brian Modra Land line: +27 23 5411 462 Mobile: +27 79 69 77 082 5 Jan Louw Str, Prince Albert, 6930 Postal: P.O. Box 2, Prince Albert 6930 South Africa http://www.zwartberg.com/
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: