Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles
От | Bossart, Nathan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5F9388A2-35EA-4DAA-BE05-68D55EEA6DC3@amazon.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles (Joshua Brindle <joshua.brindle@crunchydata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/8/21, 2:19 PM, "Joshua Brindle" <joshua.brindle@crunchydata.com> wrote: > Thanks for the review, attached is an update with that comment fixed > and also sgml documentation changes that I missed earlier. I think there are a number of documentation changes that are still missing. I did a quick scan and saw the "is member of" language in func.sgml, monitoring.sgml, pgbuffercache.sgml, pgfreespacemap.sgml, pgrowlocks.sgml, pgstatstatements.sgml, and pgvisibility.sgml. <para> By default, the <structname>pg_shmem_allocations</structname> view can be - read only by superusers or members of the <literal>pg_read_all_stats</literal> - role. + read only by superusers or roles with privilges of the + <literal>pg_read_all_stats</literal> role. </para> </sect1> nitpick: "privileges" is misspelled. Nathan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: