Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code?
От | John Scalia |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5F7F8C76-DA88-46D6-B0B6-DB9C84CE87C1@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Ok I also tried that Tom. Psql returned “Did not find any relations named “‘.temp_my_table_global” Sent from my iPad > On Nov 2, 2020, at 11:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com> writes: >> While I’m waiting for my devs to confirm the first table that I partitioned is working correctly, I started working onsecond of three that I need to do. So, I added the code to end of my original script, but there was a typo in it. Now,as this code runs in a transaction block, so I don’t think anything it created should actually be present in the database,but on a subsequent rerunning, I got an error that one of the partition tables actually exists already. However,I cannot see it, nor drop it from the server. The error in the script is: relation “temp_my_second_table_global”already exists, but the system cannot see it in order to drop it, saying “temp_my_second_table_global”does not exist. That’s really a catch-22. Is there a system table where I can look and maybedrop it from there directly? > > Kinda sounds like a confusion over search_path, ie script is creating > table in some schema that's not in your interactive search path? > > In psql, try > \d *.temp_my_second_table_global > to see instances of temp_my_second_table_global in all schemas. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: