Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От James Pye
Тема Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Дата
Msg-id 5E030568-FC05-4B79-BDF8-6CBF0F882DC0@jwp.name
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sep 8, 2009, at 10:48 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> I'd like to see pseudo-types like ANYNUMERIC, and allow it to take an
> array decorator, which would really help for math-ish functions.  Not
> sure where that fits in this discussion.

Perhaps typcategory could be leveraged here?


..Tho, if I understand the general direction, I think it would be  
along the lines of type classes/interfaces..


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CTE bug?