Re: [GENERAL] Text search dictionary vs. the C locale
От | Gmail |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Text search dictionary vs. the C locale |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5CE3528B-A3F6-4712-BF65-A50D6629C75F@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Text search dictionary vs. the C locale (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> On Jul 2, 2017, at 10:06 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > twoflower <standa.kurik@gmail.com> writes: >> I am having problems creating an Ispell-based text search dictionary for >> Czech language. > >> Issuing the following command: > >> create text search dictionary czech_ispell ( >> template = ispell, >> dictfile = czech_ispell, >> affFile = czech_ispell >> ); > >> ends with > >> ERROR: syntax error >> CONTEXT: line 252 of configuration file >> "/usr/share/postgresql/9.6/tsearch_data/czech_ispell.affix": " . > TŘIA > >> The dictionary files are in UTF-8. The database cluster was initialized with >> initdb --locale=C --encoding=UTF8 > > Presumably the problem is that the dictionary file parsing functions > reject anything that doesn't satisfy t_isalpha() (unless it matches > t_isspace()) and in C locale that's not going to accept very much. > > I wonder why we're doing it like that. It seems like it'd often be > useful to load dictionary files that don't match the database's > prevailing locale. Do we really need the t_isalpha tests, or would > it be good enough to assume that anything that isn't t_isspace is > part of a word? > > regards, tom lane > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general Apologies for truncating entire body of replied-to post
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: