Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE
От | Chapman Flack |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5C96AAD4.1090006@anastigmatix.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/23/19 16:59, Tom Lane wrote: > Unicode-code-point numbers. I removed that, made some other changes to > bring the patch more in line with PG coding style, and pushed it. Thanks! It looks good. I'm content with the extra PI checking being gone. The magic Unicode-code-point numbers come straight from the XML standard; I couldn't make that stuff up. :) > > You're not really validating that the input > is something that libxml would accept, unless its processing of XML PIs > is far stupider than I would expect it to be. Out of curiosity, what further processing would you expect libxml to do? XML parsers are supposed to be transparent PI-preservers, except in the rare case of seeing a PI that actually means something to the embedding application, which isn't going to be the case for a database simply implementing an XML data type. The standard literally requires that the target must be a NAME, and can't match [Xx][Mm][Ll], and if there's whitespace and anything after that, there can't be an embedded ?> ... and that's it. Regards, -Chap
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: