Re: Shared_buffers
От | MichaelDBA |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Shared_buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5C88107F.7040902@sqlexec.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Shared_buffers (Michael Lewis <mlewis@entrata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Shared_buffers
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Set shared_buffers more accurately by using pg_buffercache extension and the related queries during high load times.
Regards,
Michael Vitale
Regards,
Michael Vitale
Tuesday, March 12, 2019 3:23 PMOn Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 2:29 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:Daulat Ram wrote:
> I want to know about the working and importance of shared_buffers in Postgresql?
> is it similar to the oracle database buffer cache?
Yes, exactly.
The main difference is that PostgreSQL uses buffered I/O, while Oracle usually
uses direct I/O.
Usually you start with shared_buffers being the minimum of a quarter of the
available RAM and 8 GB.Any good rule of thumb or write up about when shared buffers in excess of 8GBs makes sense (assuming system ram 64+ GBs perhaps)?
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: