Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5C66AE52.4020605@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
(2019/02/14 18:44), Etsuro Fujita wrote: > (2019/02/12 20:43), Antonin Houska wrote: >> Etsuro Fujita<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> Here are my review comments: >>> >>> root->upper_targets[UPPERREL_FINAL] = final_target; >>> + root->upper_targets[UPPERREL_ORDERED] = final_target; >>> root->upper_targets[UPPERREL_WINDOW] = sort_input_target; >>> root->upper_targets[UPPERREL_GROUP_AGG] = grouping_target; >>> >>> I think that's a good idea. I think we'll soon need the PathTarget for >>> UPPERREL_DISTINCT, so how about saving that as well like this? >>> >>> root->upper_targets[UPPERREL_FINAL] = final_target; >>> + root->upper_targets[UPPERREL_ORDERED] = final_target; >>> + root->upper_targets[UPPERREL_DISTINCT] = sort_input_target; >>> root->upper_targets[UPPERREL_WINDOW] = sort_input_target; >>> root->upper_targets[UPPERREL_GROUP_AGG] = grouping_target; >> >> I see nothing wrong about this. > > Cool! > >>> Another is about this: >>> >>> /* >>> + * Set reltarget so that it's consistent with the paths. Also it's more >>> + * convenient for FDW to find the target here. >>> + */ >>> + ordered_rel->reltarget = target; >>> >>> I think this is correct if there are no SRFs in the targetlist, but >>> otherwise >>> I'm not sure this is really correct because the relation's reltarget >>> would not >>> match the target of paths added to the relation after >>> adjust_paths_for_srfs(). >> >> I wouldn't expect problem here. create_grouping_paths() also sets the >> reltarget although adjust_paths_for_srfs() can be alled on grouped_rel >> afterwards. > > Yeah, but as I said in a previous email, I think the root->upper_targets > change would be enough at least currently for FDWs to consider > performing post-UPPERREL_GROUP_AGG steps remotely, as shown in my > patches, so I'm inclined to leave the retarget change for future work. So, here is an updated patch. If there are no objections from you or anyone else, I'll commit the patch as a preliminary one for what's proposed in this thread. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: