Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
От | Chapman Flack |
---|---|
Тема | Re: House style for DocBook documentation? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5C461B32.8020403@anastigmatix.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: House style for DocBook documentation? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/21/19 13:14, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Of course, the text would also be clickable, right? I think putting the >> URL in a footnote is good in that case; it works both on screen and on >> paper, which should alleviate JD's concerns. > > Yeah I could see that. I thought about that but was wondering if it was It looks like the easiest way to integrate such a behavior into the current Makefile would be not as a separate DocBook->DocBook transform in advance, but simply by editing the existing stylesheet-fo.xsl that produces the FO input for generating the PDF. That would mean learning some FO, which I've wanted to do for a while, but haven't yet, so it stops looking like something I might experiment with this afternoon. OTOH, it could mean more flexibility in how the presentation should look. I note in passing that the google result [1] is nonempty.... -Chap [1] https://www.google.com/search?q=xsl-fo+qr+code
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: