Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
От | David E. Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5C301999-51EF-4639-90BE-1886C3A6DFD5@kineticode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jan 21, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > As far as I can see, there is absolutely zero reason to care about > whether the product is called Postgres or PostgreSQL. How about simply "Post"? Or just "SQL"? ;-P > If it were > called WeGrindUpTheBonesOfSmallChildrenSQL, maybe a change would be > worth considering. And where do you think baby powder comes from? Sheesh. > As it is, I submit that the product name is not on > in the top 10,000 things we should be worried about fixing, even if > there were a consensus that it were a good idea (which there isn't) > and even if -core had not already made a decision on this point (which > they have). What I think we SHOULD be worrying about right now is > getting 9.0 out the door, and I am 100% opposed to letting ourselves > getting sucked into this or any other discussion which is likely to > make that take longer than it likely already will. +1 David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: