Re: de-deduplicate code in DML execution hooks in postgres_fdw
| От | Etsuro Fujita |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: de-deduplicate code in DML execution hooks in postgres_fdw |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5BB21902.6000301@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: de-deduplicate code in DML execution hooks in postgres_fdw (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: de-deduplicate code in DML execution hooks in postgres_fdw
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/10/01 19:42), Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 02:17:38PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> I used perform instead of execute since the later is usually >> associated with local operation. I added "foreign" in the name of the >> function to indicate that it's executed on foreign server. I am happy >> with "remote" as well. I don't think "one" and "single" make any >> difference. I don't like "parameterized" since that gets too tied to >> the method we are using rather than what's actually being done. In >> short I don't find any of the suggestions to be significantly better >> or worse than the name I have chosen. Said that, I am not wedded to >> any of those. A committer is free to choose anything s/he likes. > > Fujita-san, you are registered as a reviewer of this patch. Are you > planning to look at it soon? Yeah, I'm planning to work on this immediately after fixing the issue [1], because it still seems to me wise to work on it after addressing that issue. (I'll post an updated version of the patch for that tomorrow.) > It looks useful to me to rework this code > anyway to help with future maintenance, Agreed. > so in the worst case I could > always look at it. For now I have moved it to the next commit fest. Thanks for taking care of this! Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: