Re: Permissions
От | Andre Labuschagne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Permissions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5B66CEB7-F033-4614-8F95-D0412652D4C8@eduadmin.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Permissions (Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@lists.simkin.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Permissions
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
Hi Alan You better believe it. The best databases on the planet do allow that - Mimer, Sybase and now I am finding Interbase as well. These vendors saythe feature I request is security 101. There are no doubt others that I have not seen nor tested yet. But not allowingthat feature means there is de facto zero security. As it stands now PG has zero security. Cheers Andre > On 20 Sep 2016, at 23:58, Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@lists.simkin.ca> wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 September 2016 23:47:53 Andre Labuschagne wrote: >> Hi Skylar >> >> We are talking about thousands of installations within the organisation. >> Ideally we need to allow the users at the installations to be able to >> create their own databases and some of them we supply from head office. >> The ones we supply applications will be using. When the on site >> administrators use something like pgAdmin they must not be able to tamper >> with the databases that we have supplied - no backing up or accessing and >> so on. Both Sybase and Mimer allow this as explicit login and password is >> required to each database, even if you are a super user. > > PostgreSQL will definitely not help you with that. I find it hard to believe > any database will allow you to ship a copy to a local admin but will have it > somehow not be readable by them, but good luck with the commercial products if > they claim to be able to. > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-novice mailing list (pgsql-novice@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-novice > >
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: