unsubscribe
От | Stevenson, Bob |
---|---|
Тема | unsubscribe |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5B51B7761BF9B949A2EC5BB06EB6734507F07B7F@ITAM1EVS1.officemax.omx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
unsubscribe -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Markus Schaber Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 3:34 AM To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types Hi, Tom, Tom Lane wrote: > One issue is what to do with procedural languages and large objects, > which don't have any associated schema. If we treat them as being > outside all schemas, we'd have semantics like this: dump the PLs and > blobs unless one or more --schema switches appeared. Is that OK? Sounds fine. Is there a possibility to dump only those objects? Maybe --large-objects and --languages? Thanks, Markus -- Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: