Re: de-deduplicate code in DML execution hooks in postgres_fdw
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: de-deduplicate code in DML execution hooks in postgres_fdw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5B51A3F6.3000701@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: de-deduplicate code in DML execution hooks in postgres_fdw (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: de-deduplicate code in DML execution hooks in postgres_fdw
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/07/20 13:49), Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:35:11PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote: >> +1 for the general idea. (Actually, I also thought the same thing before.) >> But since this is definitely a matter of PG12, ISTM that it's wise to work >> on this after addressing the issue in [1]. My concern is: if we do this >> refactoring now, we might need two patches for fixing the issue in case of >> backpatching as the fix might need to change those executor functions. > > FWIW, I would think that if some cleanup of the code is obvious, we > should make it without waiting for the other issues to settle down > because there is no way to know when those are done, I would agree to that if we were late in the development cycle for PG12. > and this patch > could be forgotten. I won't forget this patch. :) > Looking at the proposed patch, moving the new routine closer to > execute_dml_stmt and renaming it execute_dml_single_row would be nicer. Or execute_parameterized_dml_stmt? Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: