Re: Autonomous subtransactions
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autonomous subtransactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5B513EFD-7819-4600-BC09-39130CBBFBD0@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Autonomous subtransactions (Gianni Ciolli <gianni.ciolli@2ndquadrant.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autonomous subtransactions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Dec 18, 2011, at 2:28 AM, Gianni Ciolli wrote: > I have written some notes about autonomous subtransactions, which have > already been touched (at least) in two separate threads; please find > them at > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Autonomous_subtransactions The document seems to mix the terms subtransaction and autonomous transaction. That's going to generate a ton of confusion,because both terms already have meaning associated with them: - Autonomous transaction means you can execute something outside of your current transaction and it is in no way effectedby the current transaction (doesn't matter if T0 commits or not). - Subtransactions are an alternative to savepoints. They allow you to break a large transaction into smaller chunks, butif T0 doesn't commit then none of the subtransactions do either. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim@nasby.net 512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: