Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled.
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5B3DFEFB.1080007@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled. (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/07/05 20:15), Etsuro Fujita wrote: > (2018/07/04 19:11), Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Etsuro Fujita >> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> >>> I don't produce a test case where the plan is an Append with Gather >>> subplans, but I'm not sure that it's a good thing to allow us to >>> consider >>> such a plan because in that plan, each Gather would try to grab its >>> own pool >>> of workers. Am I missing something? >> >> If the overall join can not use parallelism, having individual child >> joins use parallel query might turn out to be efficient even if done >> one child at a time. Parallel append drastically reduces the cases >> where something like could be useful, but I don't think we can >> theoretically eliminate the need for such a plan. > > In the case where scanjoin_target_parallel_safe=false, we actually will > consider such parallel paths using the existing partial paths for the > parent appendrel in the code path shown in a previous email (note: we > would already have done generate_partitionwise_join_paths or > set_append_rel_pathlist for the parent appendrel in query_planner.) For > such a parallel path, we might need to do a projection in the Gather > node for generating the SRF-free scan/join target, but I think that > would be still efficient. So, I'm not sure that we really need to create > child Gathers and generate an Append with those Gathers, as you mentioned. > > Another thing I noticed is: actually, we don't produce an Append with > child Gathers in apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths, which I thought we > would do that in the case of scanjoin_target_parallel_safe=false, but I > noticed I was wrong. Sorry for that. The reason is because in that case, > even if we create new partial Append paths with child Gathers, we don't > run generate_gatehr_paths for the newly created partial paths at the end > of that function shown below, since the parent's consider_parallel flag > is set to false in that case: > > /* > * Consider generating Gather or Gather Merge paths. We must only do this > * if the relation is parallel safe, and we don't do it for child rels to > * avoid creating multiple Gather nodes within the same plan. We must do > * this after all paths have been generated and before set_cheapest, since > * one of the generated paths may turn out to be the cheapest one. > */ > if (rel->consider_parallel && !IS_OTHER_REL(rel)) > generate_gather_paths(root, rel, false); One thing to add is: ISTM we need some cleanup for apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: