Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
От | Chapman Flack |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5ABAC668.5080203@anastigmatix.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/26/18 01:43, Michael Paquier wrote: > Have a look at BKP_REMOVABLE then. This was moved to page headers in > 2dd9322, still it seems to me that the small benefits outlined on this > thread don't justify breaking tools relying on this flag set, especially > if there is no replacement for it. Is 2dd9322 a commit? I'm having difficulty finding it: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=commit&s=2dd9322 Am I searching wrong? I probably won't have more time to look at this tonight, but could I ask in advance for examples of tools that would need this bit when encountering unwritten pages at the end of a segment? I don't mean that as snark; it's just nonobvious to me and I might need a little nudge where to look. -Chap
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: