Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5A5C5031-BE8D-474D-96BF-4374A420D881@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys (Thomas Hallgren <thomas@tada.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 6, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Thomas Hallgren wrote: >> In answer to your question, though my opinion carries no special >> weight at >> all, I would suggest adding a bare bones 16-byte data type to core >> and a >> second binary-compatible data type based on it that parsed/output >> as uuids. >> The extended uuid libraries should only go in pgfoundry/contrib. > I second that. +1. If there's enough user demand we can look at adding the type to core (I don't see any real advantage to contrib over pgFoundry for this). I'm not sure if it makes sense to add a generic 16 byte RAW to core, either. I'd *much* rather see effort expended on a generic RAW type which had it's size defined as part of the type and didn't use varlena. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: