Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
От | Christopher Petrilli |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 59d991c40709030538g6be6d2aqf62477513be593cd@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) (Ron Peterson <ron.peterson@yellowbank.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 9/3/07, Ron Peterson <ron.peterson@yellowbank.com> wrote: > 2007-09-02_22:14:43-0400 Shashank Tripathi <shashank.tripathi@gmail.com>: > > > FWIW, everyone I have ever spoken to calls it Postgres. > > So if the name changes, it will be alright if everyone else continues to > call it PostgreSQL. Having used <whatevertheheckyouwannacallit> since the early 90s, and the days pre-SQL with Quel, I've always called it Postgres, everyone I've run into in the commercial/federal world who uses it calls it Postgres. I've seen multiple people comment on how verbally it is called Postgres, but in writing it's called PostgreSQL. Is it really that hard to understand that this is a major issue among the non-technical? To put it quite bluntly, I've never been stopped from using Postgres by a technical person; it has always been a manager. Often it involves long winded explanations of why he's never heard of it, where it came from, and sometimes, why it has a dumb (yes, dumb) name. Every time I write anything, I have to go back and make sure I used to dumb name, and not the one that makes sense. Today, in 2007, nobody is going to suddenly assume that we don't support SQL, and while a majority of the databases in the open source world are burdened with SQL in their name, this isn't true in the commercial world: * Oracle * Sybase * DB/2 * SQL Server * Teradata That's what people call them in the "open" world outside an echo-chamber. At some point, they might say "Oracle 10g", though I've never heard anyone say "DB/2 UDB", and truthfully never hear anyone say "Sybase" in any form any more. The argument about issues in other languages are moot. Postgres/PostgreSQL are vaguely English words, and will always be foreign to someone in Japan, regardless of which you choose. Extra care will be taken inversely proportional to the lack of care in the English-speaking world. Last I looked around, we're the only community having this confusion and discussion, which should tell you more than any one person's opinion that it will continue to occur, over and over, until something is done about it. Better now than later. Chris -- | Christopher Petrilli | petrilli@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: