Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB
От | Christopher Petrilli |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 59d991c40512020550k3bffd5eavf30a515f1f5dba90@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 12/1/05, Jan Wieck <JanWieck@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Well, reading the changelog history apparently they call 5.0.15 from > > Oct.19th "Release", so all previous versions were Beta. I wonder how > > many MySQL 5.0 users are aware of that... > > Er ... hmmmm ... so that means they have happy feature mucking during > BETA? This is unprofessional. BETA phase without feature freeze ... what > kind of hobby coders did they hire? The issue for me, personally, is that it can often be nearly impossible to know if 5.0.15 is actually a release code, or if it's beta. In addition, it's nearly impossible to know if 5.0.14 and 5.0.15 are "compatible". I'm still old-school, and believe that .z releases should *never* introduce new functionality. That's a .y release. For me, it's just a demonstration of sloppy practices in release management. Honestly, MySQL just has too damned many releases. Chris -- | Christopher Petrilli | petrilli@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: