Don't Thread On Me (PostgreSQL related)
От | Rodrigo E. De León Plicet |
---|---|
Тема | Don't Thread On Me (PostgreSQL related) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 59a05193-62f0-4e97-9b4c-d7b903c7674d@b20g2000yqb.googlegroups.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Don't Thread On Me (PostgreSQL related)
Re: Don't Thread On Me (PostgreSQL related) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Quote: ====================================================================== This thread http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Multithread-Query-Planner-td5143643.html was mentioned in a performance sub-group posting. Give it a read. Back? It means, so far as I can see, that PG is toast. It will fall down to being the cheap and dirty alternative to MySql, which even has, at least two, multi-threaded engines. DB2 switched it's *nix engine to threads from processes with release 9.5. Oracle claims it for releases going back to 7 (I haven't tried to determine which parts or applications; Larry has bought so many tchochtkes over the years...). SQL Server is threaded. Given that cpu's are breeding threads faster than cores, PG will fall into irrelevance. ====================================================================== Source: http://drcoddwasright.blogspot.com/2012/01/dont-thread-on-me.html Comments?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: