Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture
От | Ben Zeev, Lior |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 59E5FDBE8F3B144F8FCF35819B39DD4C162431ED@G6W2498.americas.hpqcorp.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Great, Thanks !!! I will try and let you update -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Frost [mailto:sfrost@snowman.net] Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 16:29 To: Ben Zeev, Lior Cc: Atri Sharma; Pg Hackers Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Process memory architecture Lior, * Ben Zeev, Lior (lior.ben-zeev@hp.com) wrote: > Yes, The memory utilization per PostgreSQL backend process is when > running queries against this tables, For example: select * from test where num=2 and c2='abc' > When It start it doesn't consume to much memory, But as it execute > against more and more indexes the memory consumption grows It might be interesting, if possible for you, to recompile PG with -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, which should cause PG to immediatelyrelease cached information when it's no longer being used. You'll be trading memory usage for CPU cycles, ofcourse, but it might be better for your situation. We may still be able to do better than what we're doing today, butI'm still suspicious that you're going to run into other issues with having 500 indexes on a table anyway. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: