Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture
От | Ben Zeev, Lior |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 59E5FDBE8F3B144F8FCF35819B39DD4C16242E27@G6W2498.americas.hpqcorp.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture (Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture
Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks Atri! Do you know why PostgreSQL store the indexes in memory per process and not in the shared memory? Is there a way to prevent it store the indexes data per process, and force it storing it in the shared memory? Lior -----Original Message----- From: Atri Sharma [mailto:atri.jiit@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 13:19 To: Ben Zeev, Lior; Pg Hackers Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Process memory architecture On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Ben Zeev, Lior <lior.ben-zeev@hp.com> wrote: > Hi Atri, > > Thanks for your answer! > Do you have idea what may be the reason that PostgreSQL process consume more memory when there are more partial indexeson the DB table? Well, I am not too sure, but indexes always take up more space, so if your backend has a lot of indexes, it will cause theprocess to consume more memory. Indexes should be used with care, as too many indexes can cause a memory overhead,which can cause performance degradations. Regards, Atri -- Regards, Atri l'apprenant
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: