Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
От | Tatsuro Yamada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 59AF9C92.4080904@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor (Tatsuro Yamada <yamada.tatsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Hackers, I revised the patch like this: - Add "command" column in the view It tells that the running command is CLUSTER or VACUUM FULL. - Enable VACUUM FULL progress monitor Add heap_tuples_vacuumed and heap_tuples_recently_dead as a counter in the view. Sequence of phases are below: 1. scanning heap 5. swapping relation files 6. rebuild index 7. performing final cleanup I didn't change the name of view (pg_stat_progress_cluster) because I'm not sure whether the new name (pg_stat_progress_reorg) is suitable or not. Any comments or suggestion are welcome. Thanks, Tatsuro Yamada On 2017/09/04 20:17, Tatsuro Yamada wrote: > On 2017/09/04 15:38, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Tatsuro Yamada >> <yamada.tatsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> Then I have questions. >>> >>> * Should we have separate views for them? Or should both be covered by the >>> same view with some indication of which command (CLUSTER or VACUUM FULL) >>> is actually running? >> >> Using the same view for both, and tell that this is rather VACUUM or >> CLUSTER in the view, would be better IMO. Coming up with a name more >> generic than pg_stat_progress_cluster may be better though if this >> speaks with VACUUM FULL as well, user-facing documentation does not >> say that VACUUM FULL is actually CLUSTER. > > Thanks for sharing your thoughts. > Agreed. > I'll add new column like a "command" to tell whether running CLUSTER or VACUUM. > And how about this new view name? > - pg_stat_progress_reorg > Is it more general name than previous name if it covers both commands? > > >>> I'll add this patch to CF2017-09. >>> Any comments or suggestion are welcome. >> >> Nice to see that you are taking the time to implement patches for >> upstream, Yamada-san! > > Same here. :) > I'd like to contribute creating feature that is for DBA and users. > Progress monitoring feature is important from my DBA experiences. > I'm happy if you lend your hand. > > Thanks, > Tatsuro Yamada -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: