Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe?
От | Larry Rosenman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 59670000.1066160221@lerlaptop-red.iadfw.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
--On Tuesday, October 14, 2003 15:31:42 -0400 Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Michael Brusser <michael@synchronicity.com> writes: >> > Yes, we use NFS. Many of our customers use it as well. >> >> You are of course aware that this is not real safe... > > Maybe we should throw a "stop using NFS" if we get an EINTR from > read()/write(), or explain what NFS options they should avoid. Err, some of us use NetApp filers as NFS servers for our PG data, and I believe that that negates at least some of the risk. I don't want to see us (PG) not support something just because it *MAY* be unsafe. LER > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road > + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania > 19073 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: