Re: check_recovery_target_lsn() does a PG_CATCH without a throw
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: check_recovery_target_lsn() does a PG_CATCH without a throw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 595d0a74-923a-849f-77b0-f398138589e6@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: check_recovery_target_lsn() does a PG_CATCH without a throw (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: check_recovery_target_lsn() does a PG_CATCH without a throw
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
This has been committed. On 2019-06-24 06:06, Michael Paquier wrote: > I have been looking at this patch set. Patch 0001 looks good to me. > You are removing all traces of a set of timestamp keywords not > supported anymore, and no objections from my side for this cleanup. > > +#define MAXPG_LSNCOMPONENT 8 > + > static bool > check_recovery_target_lsn(char **newval, void **extra, GucSource source) > Let's avoid the duplication for the declarations. I would suggest to > move the definitions of MAXPG_LSNLEN and MAXPG_LSNCOMPONENT to > pg_lsn.h. Funny part, I was actually in need of this definition a > couple of days ago for a LSN string in a frontend tool. I would > suggest renames at the same time: > - PG_LSN_LEN > - PG_LSN_COMPONENT I ended up rewriting this by extracting the parsing code into pg_lsn_in_internal() and having both pg_lsn_in() and check_recovery_target_lsn() calling it. This mirrors similar arrangements in float.c -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: