Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5863132d-a436-321b-6ef9-7c5173bd8ef3@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 6/21/17 9:47 PM, Robert Haas wrote: ...> > like int8 or numeric, it won't work at all. Even for other things, > it's going to cause problems because the bit patterns won't be what > the code is expecting; e.g. bitmap scans care about the structure of > the TID, not just how many bits it is. (Due credit: Somebody, maybe > Alvaro, pointed out this problem before, at PGCon.) Can you elaborate a bit more about this TID bit pattern issues? I do remember that not all TIDs are valid due to safeguards on individual fields, like for example Assert(iptr->ip_posid < (1 << MaxHeapTuplesPerPageBits)) But perhaps there are some other issues? regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: