Re: pgbasebackup necessary for master slave change?
| От | Achilleas Mantzios |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgbasebackup necessary for master slave change? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 58492DAB.5090404@matrix.gatewaynet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | pgbasebackup necessary for master slave change? (Subhankar Chattopadhyay <subho.atg@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgbasebackup necessary for master slave change?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 08/12/2016 11:33, Subhankar Chattopadhyay wrote: > Hi, > > Few days back I had asked if it is needed to to pg_basebackup for > every database update. From John I understood that it is unnecessary > and if the slave is syncing, even if it is catching up, it would be > able to sync without doing pg_basebackup. This is working also for me. > > However, for a failover scenario, where a master goes down, and I make > the slave as master, and then when the old master comes back as a > slave again, if I don't take pg_basebackup from the new master, it > cannot follow the new master. This is kind of an overhead. Is there a > way I can make the old master follow the new master without having to > do full backup? pg_rewind > > > > Subhankar Chattopadhyay > Bangalore, India > > -- Achilleas Mantzios IT DEV Lead IT DEPT Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: