Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5801.1020699784@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers ("Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk> writes: > Coming back to this subject if I may but only briefly, I hope. How > about making a slight change to current_schemas() and including an > optional argument such that something like: > current_schemas(1) > returns the complete list of schemas in the search path including the > implicit temporary space and the pg_catalog (if not already listed > obviously), while current_schemas() and current_schemas(0) behave as > now. I don't really care for that syntax, but certainly we could talk about providing a version of current_schemas that tells the Whole Truth. > Having something like this would enable client's like PgAccess to > determine the complete list of visible objects. Well, no, it wouldn't. Say there are multiple tables named foo in different namespaces in your search path (eg, a temp table hiding a permanent table of the same name). A test like "where current_schemas *= relnamespace" won't reflect this correctly. I'm suspecting that what we really need is some kind of "is_visible_table()" test function, and then you'd doselect * from pg_class where is_visible_table(oid); At least I've not been able to think of a better idea than that. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: