Re: to_date_valid()
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: to_date_valid() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 579823DF.3080903@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: to_date_valid() (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: to_date_valid()
Re: to_date_valid() |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/26/2016 06:25 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 7/5/16 4:24 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote: >> But notwithstanding your feeling that you would like your application >> to break if it makes use of this behaviour, it is a change that might >> make some people pretty unhappy - nobody can tell how many. > > What is the use of the existing behavior? You get back an arbitrary > implementation dependent value. We don't even guarantee what the value > will be. If we changed it to return a different implementation > dependent value, would users get upset? No they would not get upset because they wouldn't know. Can we just do the right thing? JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: